|
#84
| |||
| |||
| george1234 <george1234pds[at]excite.com> wrote: - quote - > Please, I'm not trying to be argumentative, only to explore the option
I would recommend that you at least supplement the At with oral> in greater depth. I live north of Boston and will explore registering > for the trial At the very minimum, I figure I'll receive good advice > there. antibiotics of the same type. SP -- Take out the TRAASH to reply |
|
#83
| |||
| |||
| george1234 <george1234pds[at]excite.com> wrote: - quote - > On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:47:21 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Often happens when the patient is a smoker: the smoke products act as> <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > > Could be fibrous--or fibrotic, but...what's wrong with "tough gums"? > > IMO... nothing. The periodontist said this type of gum tissue showed > little swelling or bleeding.. I took this to be a good thing antiinflammatory agents, but also hinder or block healing. SP -- Take out the TRAASH to reply |
|
#82
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:19:48 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Thanks for the update.> <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > I agree with you. As long as your oral hygiene is good, and > > inflammation is limited, and the problem areas do not deteriorate, I > > would be in no rush to surgery. > > > Thank you Steve for your help on this matter > > I had a perio exam, ~6 months after I first posted to this group > (after a periodontist recommended 4 quadrant osseous surgery post > SRP) > > Now, Pocket depth ( and cal) mostly is in the 2-3 range with an > occasional dip on the back to 5 I'm looking at the chart now... those > rows of 212 and 222 are encouraging. My understanding is anything 3 > or less is considered healthy > > Also.. my understanding is that you are looking of patterns . The 2 > std error is , itself, 1 mm . > > My plan is to clean a bit better on the back molars. The one I have > been concentrating on ( #17) is just fine > > For those of you who had this type of sugery suggested, I recommend > you concentarte on cleaning your teeth better, waiting a bit, and see > if better hygiene helps. > > It's a diffrent topic, and perhaps inappropriate, but I can't help but > suspect that the recommendation was influenced in part by the prospect > of modest financial gain on the part of the periodontist. I suspect at > the time the surgery recommendation the condition was border line, > and with a bit of pocket english thrown in, met the bare minimum > criteria for more extensive work. What raised my warning flags was the > insistance that it be done immediately with no explanation as to why > the rush. > > > --G > > Fior the uininitiated.. on each side of the tooth 3 measurements are > made of pocket depth. Hence 333 means 3 measurements of 3 mm > > Tooth Face Tounge > 1 333 435 > 2 333 534 > 3 323 323 > 4 323 323 > 5 324 324 > 6 423 323 > 7 333 323 > 8 333 323 > 9 322 222 > 10 233 222 > 11 323 222 > 12 333 323 > 13 222 323 > 14 223 323 > 15 323 333 > 16 > > > > 32 > 31 323 334 > 30 422 333 > 29 323 323 > 28 322 323 > 27 222 323 > 26 212 222 > 25 212 222 > 24 212 222 > 23 212 222 > 22 212 223 > 21 222 323 > 20 223 323 > 19 > 18 333 323 > 17 333 333 > > > > > > Do remember that raw pocket readings do not tell the whole story. Change in pocket depth combined with attachment levels over time gives a much better idea of disease activity. In any case, pocket depth reduction is a good sign. Best, Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#81
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:19:48 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: - quote - > I agree with you. As long as your oral hygiene is good, and
Thank you Steve for your help on this matter> inflammation is limited, and the problem areas do not deteriorate, I > would be in no rush to surgery. I had a perio exam, ~6 months after I first posted to this group (after a periodontist recommended 4 quadrant osseous surgery post SRP) Now, Pocket depth ( and cal) mostly is in the 2-3 range with an occasional dip on the back to 5 I'm looking at the chart now... those rows of 212 and 222 are encouraging. My understanding is anything 3 or less is considered healthy Also.. my understanding is that you are looking of patterns . The 2 std error is , itself, 1 mm . My plan is to clean a bit better on the back molars. The one I have been concentrating on ( #17) is just fine For those of you who had this type of sugery suggested, I recommend you concentarte on cleaning your teeth better, waiting a bit, and see if better hygiene helps. It's a diffrent topic, and perhaps inappropriate, but I can't help but suspect that the recommendation was influenced in part by the prospect of modest financial gain on the part of the periodontist. I suspect at the time the surgery recommendation the condition was border line, and with a bit of pocket english thrown in, met the bare minimum criteria for more extensive work. What raised my warning flags was the insistance that it be done immediately with no explanation as to why the rush. --G Fior the uininitiated.. on each side of the tooth 3 measurements are made of pocket depth. Hence 333 means 3 measurements of 3 mm Tooth Face Tounge 1 333 435 2 333 534 3 323 323 4 323 323 5 324 324 6 423 323 7 333 323 8 333 323 9 322 222 10 233 222 11 323 222 12 333 323 13 222 323 14 223 323 15 323 333 16 32 31 323 334 30 422 333 29 323 323 28 322 323 27 222 323 26 212 222 25 212 222 24 212 222 23 212 222 22 212 223 21 222 323 20 223 323 19 18 333 323 17 333 333 |
|
#80
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On 25 Oct 2005 15:00:17 -0700, "rich[at]away32.com" <rich[at]away32.com> > wrote: > > > > So, is it, or is it not bacterial???? > > Richard > > > Yes, but it is more than a single bug, > . > http://dentalschool.bu.edu/ce/spring...iles/frame.htm > > Slide 12 gives you a clue as to how they classify > Slide 13 gives you an indication of the jungle down there > Slide 14 gives you a clue whree these beasts live > > > As near as I can make out, the whole point of preriodontal treatment > is to get your gums in good enough shape that you can take care of > them yourself. > I had assumed so. The implication of this rationale is that if the patient then choses to not practice adequate oral hygiene they have accomplished just about zero. Years ago I put this to a periodontist at NYU when I was on the faculty. He felt that on a maintenance schedule of one recall every 3 months the bacterial flora was sufficiently disrupted that there would be significant benefit to the patient even in the absence of oral hygiene. I'm willing to accept that this could be true. However, all these years later I'm not totally convinced. In any case, I was skeptical of such a self-serving argument. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#79
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:20:46 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld > <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > I may need a refresher course on taxonomy. I don't know where > > rickettsiae , chlamydiae, and PPLO fit into this scheme. > > > > Steve > > > > Another good place to look for info on archae is here > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaea > > --G ....and I will. Thanks--I find this fascinating stuff. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#78
| |||
| |||
| On 25 Oct 2005 15:00:17 -0700, "rich[at]away32.com" <rich[at]away32.com> wrote: - quote - > So, is it, or is it not bacterial????
Yes, but it is more than a single bug,> Richard .. http://dentalschool.bu.edu/ce/spring...iles/frame.htm Slide 12 gives you a clue as to how they classify Slide 13 gives you an indication of the jungle down there Slide 14 gives you a clue whree these beasts live As near as I can make out, the whole point of preriodontal treatment is to get your gums in good enough shape that you can take care of them yourself. |
|
#77
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 15:20:46 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: - quote - > > I may need a refresher course on taxonomy. I don't know where > rickettsiae , chlamydiae, and PPLO fit into this scheme. > > Steve Another good place to look for info on archae is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaea --G |
|
#76
| |||
| |||
| On 25 Oct 2005 15:00:17 -0700, "rich[at]away32.com" <rich[at]away32.com> wrote: - quote - > Thank you all for your information on whether Periodontal Disease is
True, there is no such thing as periodontal disease ........ please do> contagious. > > I have concluded from your answers that Periodontal Disease is a > figment of the ADA's imagination. not tell the patients though. Joel - quote - > All you dentists don't have a clue > where it comes from. > > Simple and thorough cleaning seems to eradicate it. Do that with a lung > infection. > > Also, the poor sap who dismissed kissing because it does not preserve > the anerobic environment obviously needs lessons in deep tongue > kissing. :0 > > So, is it, or is it not bacterial???? > Richard |
|
#75
| |||
| |||
| Thank you all for your information on whether Periodontal Disease is contagious. I have concluded from your answers that Periodontal Disease is a figment of the ADA's imagination. All you dentists don't have a clue where it comes from. Simple and thorough cleaning seems to eradicate it. Do that with a lung infection. Also, the poor sap who dismissed kissing because it does not preserve the anerobic environment obviously needs lessons in deep tongue kissing. :0 So, is it, or is it not bacterial???? Richard |
|
#74
| |||
| |||
| Mark & Steven Bornfeld wrote: - quote - > george1234 wrote:
This is helpful in that regard:> > > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:42:12 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld > > <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > > > > george1234 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > BTW.. not all of it is bacteria, archaea is one of the mix > > > > .http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../307/5717/1899 > > > > > > > > > That's a new one on me. > > > > > > > > It probably comes out of the Forsyth studies on microorganism in the > > mouth. As the article states they hae a technique to quickly > > categorize the species > > > > "The more severe the disease, the larger the archaea population--and > > that population shrank with treatments that lessened gum disease." > > > > > > I was dimly aware of bacteria-like organisms that existed in extreme > conditions. I did not know that they were considered taxonomically > different from bacteria. > I may need a refresher course on taxonomy. I don't know where > rickettsiae , chlamydiae, and PPLO fit into this scheme. > > Steve > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monera Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#73
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:42:12 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
I was dimly aware of bacteria-like organisms that existed in extreme> <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > george1234 wrote: > > > > > BTW.. not all of it is bacteria, archaea is one of the mix > > > .http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../307/5717/1899 > > > > That's a new one on me. > > > It probably comes out of the Forsyth studies on microorganism in the > mouth. As the article states they hae a technique to quickly > categorize the species > > "The more severe the disease, the larger the archaea population--and > that population shrank with treatments that lessened gum disease." > > conditions. I did not know that they were considered taxonomically different from bacteria. I may need a refresher course on taxonomy. I don't know where rickettsiae , chlamydiae, and PPLO fit into this scheme. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#72
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:39:03 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
Yes.> <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > This actually supports my contention that periodontal disease is > > unlikely to be transmitted--except via DNA. ;-) > > > It does.. it says you can transmit the micro-organisms, but they will > not cause the disease unless the conditions are ripe ( DNA) for them > > It's a little different from what the AAP was saying. I suspect those > subtle horse hockey purveyors make the implicit assumption that > children share the DNA of their parents, and are more likely to > develop the disease when exposed to the micro-organisms that cause the > disease in their parents. > > --G > BTW, bacteria associated with caries (esp. strep. mutans) are more easily demonstrated to be transmitted orally--and that in fact this ultimately does contribute to caries experience. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#71
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:42:12 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: - quote - > george1234 wrote:
It probably comes out of the Forsyth studies on microorganism in the> > BTW.. not all of it is bacteria, archaea is one of the mix > > .http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../307/5717/1899 > That's a new one on me. mouth. As the article states they hae a technique to quickly categorize the species "The more severe the disease, the larger the archaea population--and that population shrank with treatments that lessened gum disease." |
|
#70
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:39:03 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: - quote - > This actually supports my contention that periodontal disease is
It does.. it says you can transmit the micro-organisms, but they will> unlikely to be transmitted--except via DNA. ;-) not cause the disease unless the conditions are ripe ( DNA) for them It's a little different from what the AAP was saying. I suspect those subtle horse hockey purveyors make the implicit assumption that children share the DNA of their parents, and are more likely to develop the disease when exposed to the micro-organisms that cause the disease in their parents. --G |
|
#69
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:22:54 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
That's a new one on me.> <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: > > > > > It is contagious mostly only theoretically. Most of the bacteria > > responsible for periodontal breakdown are anaerobic. If you do not have > > pre-existing deep pockets, it is unlikely they would get a real > > foothold. Furthermore, while it isn't impossible, these anaerobes are > > unlikely to be found in high concentrations in the saliva. > > Periodontal disease is not as simple as a bacterial infection anyhow. > > There are host (immunologic) factors that influence greatly the > > susceptibility to breakdown even in the presence of potentially > > pathogenic bacteria. > > > > Your point of view is similar to that stated in "Bacterial > transmission in periodontal diseases: a critical review." cited > above.. you can transmit the bacteria but it may or may not cause the > disease > > BTW.. not all of it is bacteria, archaea is one of the mix > > .http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../307/5717/1899 > > "In 2004, as part of their surveys of this crevice, Relman, Lepp, and > their colleagues discovered that some of these more troublesome > microbes weren't even bacteria. They were archaea, members of a group > of microbes best known for thriving in extreme conditions." > Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#68
| |||
| |||
| george1234 wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:40:24 -0400, george1234 > <george1234pds[at]excite.com> wrote: > > > > Well... nothing like a clear opinion, but not much I can do with > > that I got my horse hockey info from the misinformed flammers at the> > american academy of periodontology > > > > http://www.perio.org/consumer/families.html > > > These horse hockey proponent s even managed to do a critical review > > > J Periodontol. 1997 May;68(5):421-31. Related Articles, Links > > Bacterial transmission in periodontal diseases: a critical review. > > Greenstein G, Lamster I. > > Department of Periodontology, University of Medicine and Dentistry > of New Jersey, Newark, USA. > > " This review paper addresses intra- and extra-familial transfer of > bacteria associated with periodontal diseases. Recent advances in > molecular biology provide sensitive methods to differentiate organisms > within the same species, thereby facilitating tracking routes of their > transmission. Evidence for the passing of microorganisms between > parents and children is particularly strong. In this regard, molecular > genetic techniques have demonstrated that if a child is colonized by a > potentially pathogenic species, then one of the parents will usually > harbor genotypically identical bacteria. The data also indicate that > transfer of bacteria between spouses occur, but it appears to happen > infrequently. Saliva appears to be a major vector for bacterial > transmission. However, the transfer of organisms does not necessarily > result in colonization or infection of the host. Furthermore, > individuals who harbor putative pathogens frequently do not manifest > any signs of periodontal disease. This is attributed to host defenses, > bacterial antagonism, and possibly lack of pathogenicity of infecting > organisms. It is concluded, based upon current evidence, that > periodontal pathogens are communicable; however, they are not readily > transmissible". This actually supports my contention that periodontal disease is unlikely to be transmitted--except via DNA. ;-) Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
|
#67
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:22:54 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld <bornfeldmung[at]dentaltwins.com> wrote: - quote - > It is contagious mostly only theoretically. Most of the bacteria > responsible for periodontal breakdown are anaerobic. If you do not have > pre-existing deep pockets, it is unlikely they would get a real > foothold. Furthermore, while it isn't impossible, these anaerobes are > unlikely to be found in high concentrations in the saliva. > Periodontal disease is not as simple as a bacterial infection anyhow. > There are host (immunologic) factors that influence greatly the > susceptibility to breakdown even in the presence of potentially > pathogenic bacteria. Your point of view is similar to that stated in "Bacterial transmission in periodontal diseases: a critical review." cited above.. you can transmit the bacteria but it may or may not cause the disease BTW.. not all of it is bacteria, archaea is one of the mix ..http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/conten.../307/5717/1899 "In 2004, as part of their surveys of this crevice, Relman, Lepp, and their colleagues discovered that some of these more troublesome microbes weren't even bacteria. They were archaea, members of a group of microbes best known for thriving in extreme conditions." |
|
#66
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:40:24 -0400, george1234 <george1234pds[at]excite.com> wrote: - quote - > Well... nothing like a clear opinion, but not much I can do with
These horse hockey proponent s even managed to do a critical review> that I got my horse hockey info from the misinformed flammers at the> american academy of periodontology > > http://www.perio.org/consumer/families.html J Periodontol. 1997 May;68(5):421-31. Related Articles, Links Bacterial transmission in periodontal diseases: a critical review. Greenstein G, Lamster I. Department of Periodontology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, USA. " This review paper addresses intra- and extra-familial transfer of bacteria associated with periodontal diseases. Recent advances in molecular biology provide sensitive methods to differentiate organisms within the same species, thereby facilitating tracking routes of their transmission. Evidence for the passing of microorganisms between parents and children is particularly strong. In this regard, molecular genetic techniques have demonstrated that if a child is colonized by a potentially pathogenic species, then one of the parents will usually harbor genotypically identical bacteria. The data also indicate that transfer of bacteria between spouses occur, but it appears to happen infrequently. Saliva appears to be a major vector for bacterial transmission. However, the transfer of organisms does not necessarily result in colonization or infection of the host. Furthermore, individuals who harbor putative pathogens frequently do not manifest any signs of periodontal disease. This is attributed to host defenses, bacterial antagonism, and possibly lack of pathogenicity of infecting organisms. It is concluded, based upon current evidence, that periodontal pathogens are communicable; however, they are not readily transmissible". |
|
#65
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 17:40:32 GMT, W_B <no_one[at]nowhere.net> wrote: - quote - > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 11:58:22 -0400, george1234 <george1234pds[at]excite.com> wrote:
Well... nothing like a clear opinion, but not much I can do with> > My understanding is yes.. it is contagious and you can re-infect by > > swapping saliva with an infected partner > > > > Horse hockey. that I got my horse hockey info from the misinformed flammers at theamerican academy of periodontology http://www.perio.org/consumer/families.html "Transmission of Gum Disease Between Family Members Periodontal (gum) disease may be passed from parents to children and between couples, according to an article in the September 1997 issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association. This research concurs with other recent findings that support the association between periodontal disease and family members. Researchers suggest bacteria that cause periodontal disease pass though saliva. This means that the common contact of saliva in families puts children and couples at risk for contracting the periodontal disease of another family member. Periodontal disease can lead to tooth loss. Based on this research, the American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) recognizes that treatment of gum disease may involve entire families. If one family member has periodontal disease, the AAP recommends that all family members see a dental professional for a periodontal screening. " |
| Tags |
| advice, periodontal, searching, technical, word |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| periodontal surgery (2nd try) Mary: I had surgery two weeks ago to remove pockets in two areas, upper and lower. The lower came out really well (almost all these teeth have crowns) I have no visible margins of the crowns on the lower jaw, but one crown towards the front of the... | Mary | Dentistry | 1 | 11-23-2004 08:52 PM |
| periodontal decisions laura davis: Looking for advice: Went to a periodonist and was told I have deep pockets - many 7 plus as well as bone loss in many teeth. I'm not sure of the bone loss percentages. He told me that I have two options, the first being deep cleaning and... | laura davis | Dentistry | 6 | 06-14-2004 02:31 PM |
| Technical query Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS: Anyone our there using air abrasion? If so, is it realistic to use one without a chairside assistant, or is it too messy? Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 | Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS | Dentistry | 9 | 12-03-2003 04:43 PM |
| Technical question re: use of Fuji II LC Seto: Hi all, A dental colleague described his technique to me that he uses whenever he is doing a class II composite where the gingival seat ends in dentin only with no enamel present. He places a resin modified glass ionomer (Fuju II LC) at the... | Seto | Dentistry | 9 | 11-22-2003 12:36 AM |
| Re: Advice on PERIODONTAL DISEASE? Carey Gregory: t1000@webtv.net (Vic Martinez) wrote: >So, I went to the Dentist yesterday for a routine/regular exam/cleaning, >and to my HORROR, I was devastated to learn I had ''irreversable'' gum >disease(comfirmed by x-ray) I'm 42, and extremely healthy... | Carey Gregory | Dentistry | 12 | 11-21-2003 04:57 PM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |