|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Marshall Price wrote: - quote - > bobbie sellers wrote:
Certainly there is more to life than treats but broccoli is very> > Marshall Price wrote: > > > trigonometry1972[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > > On May 3, 5:08 pm, Marshall Price <d0213...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > > > > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > > > > I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. How could > > > > > AGEs > > > > > get into chocolate? > > > > Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act > > > > of glycation with other food components and > > > > products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts, > > > > if memory serves me. > > > > > > > > I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a > > > > question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work. > > > Sorry about the way I reacted. > > > > > > I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it? > > > > > But who cares if chocolate is good or bad for one's long term > > health as long as it is tasty. Death is inevitable in this very > > temporary > > life so relax and have a nice truffle or other chocolate treat. > > Have all the regulars gone off on a world chocolate tour or > > something > > of like nature? > > > > On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the > > local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve > > their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them > > equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow. > > > > later > > bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com) > > > > I'm posting in sci.med.nutrition. We discuss nutrition here, and > we're all very interested in what's "good or bad for one's long term > health." There's more to life than "treats," IMHO. nice when prepared properly. Besides the treats and the food that is simply good for you or necessary there are lots of pain and eventually death. And when you get old enough you realize that none of these are bad. Lots of people in the world are living on a diet so bad it is no wonder they cannot think straight about the issues affecting their lives and strike out at others who are so well off that they can think about the illusory issue of long term health. I say illusory because all you can do if you are lucky with a good genetic heritage and careful in your activities is stay healthy for one human life time. There is no evidence that this will help the real problems people face every day. It might do better to think about spreading the food to the people who are not getting enough nutrition and about production of food that is sustainable in terms of the life of the earth. Thank whatever for the cocao bean and chocolate. later bliss - cocao powered -- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco Ningen banji Human beings do Samazama no Every single kind Baka a suru Of stupid thing --- 117th edition of Haifu Yanagidaru published in 1832 |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| bobbie sellers wrote: - quote - > Marshall Price wrote:
I'm posting in sci.med.nutrition. We discuss nutrition here, and> > trigonometry1972[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > On May 3, 5:08 pm, Marshall Price <d0213...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > > > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > > > I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. How could AGEs > > > > get into chocolate? > > > Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act > > > of glycation with other food components and > > > products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts, > > > if memory serves me. > > > > > > I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a > > > question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work. > > Sorry about the way I reacted. > > > > I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it? > > > But who cares if chocolate is good or bad for one's long term > health as long as it is tasty. Death is inevitable in this very temporary > life so relax and have a nice truffle or other chocolate treat. > > Have all the regulars gone off on a world chocolate tour or something > of like nature? > > On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the > local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve > their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them > equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow. > > later > bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com) > we're all very interested in what's "good or bad for one's long term health." There's more to life than "treats," IMHO. -- Marshall Price of Miami Known to Yahoo as d021317c |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Mark Thorson wrote: - quote - > bobbie sellers wrote:
local. I had to leave on other business before the show was over.> > > On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the > > local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve > > their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them > > equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow. > > > > That was the show with Dave Guittard on it? > I think that may have been a local KQED-FM show, > not a national PRI show. > It may have been local, certes the Guittard family is quite later bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com) -- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed, the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning. It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion." --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| bobbie sellers wrote: - quote - >
That was the show with Dave Guittard on it?> On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the > local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve > their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them > equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow. I think that may have been a local KQED-FM show, not a national PRI show. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Marshall Price wrote: - quote - > trigonometry1972[at]gmail.com | wrote:
health as long as it is tasty. Death is inevitable in this very temporary> > On May 3, 5:08 pm, Marshall Price <d0213...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > > trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > > I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. How could AGEs > > > get into chocolate? > > > > Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act > > of glycation with other food components and > > products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts, > > if memory serves me. > > > > I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a > > question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work. > > Sorry about the way I reacted. > > I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it? > But who cares if chocolate is good or bad for one's long term life so relax and have a nice truffle or other chocolate treat. Have all the regulars gone off on a world chocolate tour or something of like nature? On PBS yesterday there was a great show on chocolate and how the local chocolatiers are helping the growers all over the world to improve their crops by teaching them about making chocolate and giving them equipment so that they can make chocolate and taste what they grow. later bliss -- C O C O A Powered... (at california dot com) -- bobbie sellers - a retired nurse in San Francisco "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of cocoa that the thoughts acquire speed, the thighs acquire girth, the girth become a warning. It is by theobromine alone I set my mind in motion." --from Someone else's Dune spoof ripped to my taste. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| trigonometry1972[at]gmail.com | wrote: - quote - > On May 3, 5:08 pm, Marshall Price <d0213...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
Sorry about the way I reacted.> > trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com | wrote: > > > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. How could AGEs > > get into chocolate? > > Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act > of glycation with other food components and > products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts, > if memory serves me. > > I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a > question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work. I think that's the Maillard reaction you're talking about, isn't it? -- Marshall Price of Miami Known to Yahoo as d021317c |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On May 3, 5:08*pm, Marshall Price <d0213...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com | wrote:
Sorry, it is a roasted food. This heating pushes sugar into the act> > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > * *I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. *How could AGEs > get into chocolate? > > -- > Marshall Price of Miami > Known to Yahoo as d021317c of glycation with other food components and products are known Advanced Glycation Endproducts, if memory serves me. I get lazy and use acronyms. I'll happily expand on a topic if a question ask. Provided it doesn't involve too much work. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| trigonometry1972[at]gmail.com | wrote: - quote - > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts.
I'm afraid you're getting close to a plonking, Trig. How could AGEsget into chocolate? -- Marshall Price of Miami Known to Yahoo as d021317c |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 25, 9:05*pm, Kevysmom <bluebun...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they
I certainly committed enough typos in the riff.> > were younger in order to influence young women. > > Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts? > > Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of > > the third world. TV network news reporters want to know. > > During the next election related debate, they will > > ask this vital question. > > Laughing out loud! Thats was truly funny! BTW, Texas is not great, > Bush is from texas! My list of chocolate related effects wasn't a parody but of course much of the content was parody and a bit gentle mocking with a number of serious points to be made. Including what I see as the "logic" of of Mark's reasonings. - quote - > > On Apr 25, 11:50 pm, "trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com |" > > <trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 25, 8:24 pm, "trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com |" > > > <trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Apr 25, 2:17 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...[at]sonic.net> wrote: > > > > > Bad news for chocolate. *Raises heart rate, > > > > otherwise nothing. * *:-( > > > > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > > > > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > > > > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > > > > on variables associated with neuropsychological > > > > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > > > > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > > > > intact older adults. > > > > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > > > > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > > > > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > > > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > > > > increased interest in the potential health- > > > > related benefits of antioxidant- and > > > > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > > > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > > > > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > > > > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > > > > with neuropsychological functioning and > > > > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > > > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > > > > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > > > > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > > > > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > > > > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > > > > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > > > > products each day for 6 wk. > > > > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > > > > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > > > > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > > > > interactions were found for the > > > > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > > > > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > > > > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > > > > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > > > > group were significantly higher than those > > > > at baseline and significantly higher than > > > > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > > > > the control group. Results of a follow-up > > > > questionnaire item on the treatment products > > > > that participants believed they had consumed > > > > during the trial showed that more than half > > > > of the participants in both groups correctly > > > > identified the products that they had > > > > ingested during the experiment. > > > > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > > > > support the predicted beneficial effects > > > > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > > > > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > > > > or cardiovascular health-related variables > > > > included in this research. Consumption of > > > > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > > > > associated with significantly higher pulse > > > > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. > > > If only the poor ate chocolate, it would either be taxed > > like tobacco or it would banned and its users > > put away for 20 years at least in the great > > State of Texas. Chocolate is a soft drug. > > Just say No to chocolate. > > > It speeds the pulse. > > It has weak aphordisiac properties unsuitable to the masses. > > It gives a sense of well being. > > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > > It alkaloids speed the death of the bone building cells. > > It contains white sugar and often milk. > > It is even known to contain the deadly peanut at times. > > > It is a foodstuff only suitable to college aged Democrats and the > > Dutch. > > Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they > > were younger in order to influence young women. > > Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts? > > Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of > > the third world. TV network news reporters want to know. > > During the next election related debate, they will > > ask this vital question. > > > Perhaps in the future Mark Thorson will ask > > that chocolate, be made a prescription item. > > Perhaps he will hope the research will prove it is suitable for > > use in terminal cancer patients only. > > And then only after a double blinded cross over study > > following the patients unto the end life and provided no > > deaths occur during the study should chocolate > > products be permitted in the hands of the public by > > the all knowing US-FDA.. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they > were younger in order to influence young women. > Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts? > Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of > the third world. TV network news reporters want to know. > During the next election related debate, they will > ask this vital question. Laughing out loud! Thats was truly funny! BTW, Texas is not great, Bush is from texas! On Apr 25, 11:50 pm, "trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com |" <trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Apr 25, 8:24 pm, "trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com |" > > > > <trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2:17 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...[at]sonic.net> wrote: > > > > Bad news for chocolate. Raises heart rate, > > > otherwise nothing. :-( > > > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > > > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > > > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > > > on variables associated with neuropsychological > > > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > > > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > > > intact older adults. > > > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > > > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > > > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > > > increased interest in the potential health- > > > related benefits of antioxidant- and > > > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > > > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > > > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > > > with neuropsychological functioning and > > > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > > > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > > > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > > > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > > > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > > > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > > > products each day for 6 wk. > > > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > > > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > > > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > > > interactions were found for the > > > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > > > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > > > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > > > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > > > group were significantly higher than those > > > at baseline and significantly higher than > > > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > > > the control group. Results of a follow-up > > > questionnaire item on the treatment products > > > that participants believed they had consumed > > > during the trial showed that more than half > > > of the participants in both groups correctly > > > identified the products that they had > > > ingested during the experiment. > > > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > > > support the predicted beneficial effects > > > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > > > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > > > or cardiovascular health-related variables > > > included in this research. Consumption of > > > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > > > associated with significantly higher pulse > > > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. > > If only poor ate chocolate, it would either be taxed > like tobacco or it would banned and its users > put away for 20 years at least in the great > State of Texas. Chocolate is a soft drug. > Just say No to chocolate. > > It speeds the pulse. > It has weak aphordisiac. > It gives a sense of well being. > It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. > It alkaloids speed the death of the bone building cells. > It contains white sugar and often milk. > It is even known to contain the deadly peanut at times. > > It is a foodstuff only suitable to college aged Democrats and the > Dutch. > Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they > were younger in order to influence young women. > Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts? > Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of > the third world. TV network news reporters want to know. > During the next election related debate, they will > ask this vital question. > > Perhaps in the future Mark Thorson will ask > that chocolate, be made a prescription item. > Perhaps he will hope the research will prove it is suitable for > use in terminal cancer patients only. > And then only after a double blinded cross over study > following the patients unto the end life and provided no > deaths occur during the study should chocolate > products be permitted in the hands of the public by > the all knowing US-FDA.. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 25, 8:24*pm, "trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com |" <trigonometry1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Apr 25, 2:17*pm, Mark Thorson <nos...[at]sonic.net> wrote:
If only poor ate chocolate, it would either be taxed> > > Bad news for chocolate. *Raises heart rate, > > otherwise nothing. * *:-( > > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > > on variables associated with neuropsychological > > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > > intact older adults. > > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > > increased interest in the potential health- > > related benefits of antioxidant- and > > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > > with neuropsychological functioning and > > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > > products each day for 6 wk. > > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > > interactions were found for the > > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > > group were significantly higher than those > > at baseline and significantly higher than > > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > > the control group. Results of a follow-up > > questionnaire item on the treatment products > > that participants believed they had consumed > > during the trial showed that more than half > > of the participants in both groups correctly > > identified the products that they had > > ingested during the experiment. > > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > > support the predicted beneficial effects > > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > > or cardiovascular health-related variables > > included in this research. Consumption of > > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > > associated with significantly higher pulse > > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. like tobacco or it would banned and its users put away for 20 years at least in the great State of Texas. Chocolate is a soft drug. Just say No to chocolate. It speeds the pulse. It has weak aphordisiac. It gives a sense of well being. It contains those dangerous Advanced Gylcation Endproducts. It alkaloids speed the death of the bone building cells. It contains white sugar and often milk. It is even known to contain the deadly peanut at times. It is a foodstuff only suitable to college aged Democrats and the Dutch. Obama and McCain distributed chocolates when they were younger in order to influence young women. Were these youthful indiscretions on there parts? Or where they benefiting from exploited workers of the third world. TV network news reporters want to know. During the next election related debate, they will ask this vital question. Perhaps in the future Mark Thorson will ask that chocolate, be made a prescription item. Perhaps he will hope the research will prove it is suitable for use in terminal cancer patients only. And then only after a double blinded cross over study following the patients unto the end life and provided no deaths occur during the study should chocolate products be permitted in the hands of the public by the all knowing US-FDA.. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Its good for you, thens its NOT good for you! Heck, a little bit wont do anyone harm! On Apr 25, 5:17 pm, Mark Thorson <nos...[at]sonic.net> wrote: - quote - > Bad news for chocolate. Raises heart rate, > otherwise nothing. :-( > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > on variables associated with neuropsychological > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > intact older adults. > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > increased interest in the potential health- > related benefits of antioxidant- and > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > with neuropsychological functioning and > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > products each day for 6 wk. > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > interactions were found for the > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > group were significantly higher than those > at baseline and significantly higher than > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > the control group. Results of a follow-up > questionnaire item on the treatment products > that participants believed they had consumed > during the trial showed that more than half > of the participants in both groups correctly > identified the products that they had > ingested during the experiment. > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > support the predicted beneficial effects > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > or cardiovascular health-related variables > included in this research. Consumption of > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > associated with significantly higher pulse > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Apr 25, 2:17*pm, Mark Thorson <nos...[at]sonic.net> wrote: - quote - > Bad news for chocolate. *Raises heart rate, > otherwise nothing. * *:-( > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > on variables associated with neuropsychological > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > intact older adults. > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > increased interest in the potential health- > related benefits of antioxidant- and > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > with neuropsychological functioning and > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > products each day for 6 wk. > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > interactions were found for the > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > group were significantly higher than those > at baseline and significantly higher than > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > the control group. Results of a follow-up > questionnaire item on the treatment products > that participants believed they had consumed > during the trial showed that more than half > of the participants in both groups correctly > identified the products that they had > ingested during the experiment. > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > support the predicted beneficial effects > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > or cardiovascular health-related variables > included in this research. Consumption of > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > associated with significantly higher pulse > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. |
| | |||
| |||
| Mark Thorson wrote: - quote - > Bad news for chocolate. Raises heart rate, > otherwise nothing. :-( > > > Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. > A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized > trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa > on variables associated with neuropsychological > functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical > findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively > intact older adults. > Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. > Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State > University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. > > BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been > increased interest in the potential health- > related benefits of antioxidant- and > phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. > > OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to > examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark > chocolate and cocoa on variables associated > with neuropsychological functioning and > cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. > > DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, > fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was > used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly > assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar > and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially > sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo > products each day for 6 wk. > > RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate > and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, > midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) > interactions were found for the > neuropsychological, hematological, or blood > pressure variables examined. In contrast, the > midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate > assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa > group were significantly higher than those > at baseline and significantly higher than > the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in > the control group. Results of a follow-up > questionnaire item on the treatment products > that participants believed they had consumed > during the trial showed that more than half > of the participants in both groups correctly > identified the products that they had > ingested during the experiment. > > CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to > support the predicted beneficial effects > of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa > consumption on any of the neuropsychological > or cardiovascular health-related variables > included in this research. Consumption of > dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, > associated with significantly higher pulse > rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. SUPER news for me Mark. I have low blood pressure, so I need a boost. Now where did I put that bucket of 72% chocs? Yum! Yum! |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Bad news for chocolate. Raises heart rate, otherwise nothing. :-( Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Apr;87(4):872-80. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of dark chocolate and cocoa on variables associated with neuropsychological functioning and cardiovascular health: clinical findings from a sample of healthy, cognitively intact older adults. Crews WD Jr, Harrison DW, Wright JW. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24506, USA. BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been increased interest in the potential health- related benefits of antioxidant- and phytochemical-rich dark chocolate and cocoa. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to examine the short-term (6 wk) effects of dark chocolate and cocoa on variables associated with neuropsychological functioning and cardiovascular health in healthy older adults. DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group clinical trial was used. Participants (n = 101) were randomly assigned to receive a 37-g dark chocolate bar and 8 ounces (237 mL) of an artificially sweetened cocoa beverage or similar placebo products each day for 6 wk. RESULTS: No significant group (dark chocolate and cocoa or placebo)-by-trial (baseline, midpoint, and end-of-treatment assessments) interactions were found for the neuropsychological, hematological, or blood pressure variables examined. In contrast, the midpoint and end-of-treatment mean pulse rate assessments in the dark chocolate and cocoa group were significantly higher than those at baseline and significantly higher than the midpoint and end-of-treatment rates in the control group. Results of a follow-up questionnaire item on the treatment products that participants believed they had consumed during the trial showed that more than half of the participants in both groups correctly identified the products that they had ingested during the experiment. CONCLUSIONS: This investigation failed to support the predicted beneficial effects of short-term dark chocolate and cocoa consumption on any of the neuropsychological or cardiovascular health-related variables included in this research. Consumption of dark chocolate and cocoa was, however, associated with significantly higher pulse rates at 3- and 6-wk treatment assessments. |
| Tags |
| chocolate, debunked |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How much CHOCOLATE for benefits? Steve: How much chocolate do you need to eat per day to get the benefits? I buy 100gram Lindt 85% bars. They have 10 squares, 10grams each. If I have 1 square, will that do me any good? Thanks. Steve | Steve | Nutrition | 26 | 05-03-2008 04:43 PM |
| chocolate morgana: What industrial state of the healthy art produced chocolate is there to buy? | morgana | Nutrition | 4 | 04-28-2007 03:47 PM |
| Ferritin as inflammatory marker DEBUNKED ironjustice: Seems .. hyperferritinemia .. does NOT .. "evidence inflammation" .. <<snip>> effect of the inflammatory status factor on ferritin level was very weak. <<snip>> Clin Biochem. 2007 Mar;40(5-6):359-64. Epub 2007 Jan 5. Links Evaluation of a... | ironjustice | Nutrition | 14 | 04-19-2007 07:04 AM |
| chocolate and acne aegis: It is commonly held that 'chocolate' does not cause acne. That acne arises from the inflammation of pores due to hormonal imbalance. However, I am curious if anyone knows what study concluded this and how they defined 'chocolate'? Was it dark... | aegis | Nutrition | 1 | 02-25-2007 02:26 AM |
| Grains in the Agrarian diet as the causative factor for diseases of affluence hypotheses is easily debunked. Mr-Natural-Health: This felicitous hypothesis says that grains are the environmental factor specific to agrarian societies that is responsible for diseases of affluence. http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=16336696 The easiest... | Mr-Natural-Health | Nutrition | 45 | 03-07-2006 11:18 PM |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |